The Criminal code and other Canadian legislation are quite
specific "Everyone commits an offence who uses or transfers
(republishes) the possession of, sends, or delivers to any person or place,
transports transmit, (articles) alters, disposes of any property is guilty of
a criminal offence?
Today anyone can make a video from pictures of you that are
floating around on the internet and put it stories in a seemingly compromising
position for illegal gain, character assassination and breaking news stories
between feuding political views.
There are many tools like www.ezvid.com/, iMovie (www.apple.com/ilife/imovie/), photoshop and using special effects for motion like the Ken Burns with Fotomagico by
Boinx. or others for making a series of staged videos or pictures that would
appear to be you doing anything that might come to the dealers or journalists
minds.
Until this phantom unverified video, currently being ransomed
for a drug dealer’s profit and a sleazy gossip blog site has been forensically
photo analyzed by an appropriate law enforcement agency the editorial board of
the Toronto Star, their two reporters along with the entire world of public
opinion Do NOT know if the video or photo is authentic or a doctored ruse.
No media corporation including the Toronto Star has the legal,
moral or ethical rights to publish stories or editorials based on a phantom
unverified video, currently being ransomed for drug dealers' profit and a sleazy
gossip blog site that has NOT been verified and forensically photo analyzed
by an appropriate law enforcement agency.
Media corporations that decide to take it upon themselves to be
the police, judge, and jury then pronounce sentencing based on a staged cell
phone video that is legally unverifiable and being ransomed for millions of
dollars to the highest bidder by self-confessed Toronto Somali drug dealers’
needs to be reigned-in and investigated.
These so-called journalists, reporters along with their media bosses know that what they are doing is reckless and shows no respect for the public, or readers in general. It has become more than obvious of late to all Canadians as elsewhere that ethics within the print media, in general, today is a nicety that their financial bottom line cannot afford and thus does not support.
For close to two
months this media organization, after being contacted by these self-confessed
scumbags, neither informed the authorities (police) nor had the ethics to first
seek confirmation and substantiate or verify such political character assassination
attempts for money.
Why since May 3,
2013, or prior did the Toronto Star’s media corporation NOT make any attempts to
privately confront the Mayor about such public defamatory allegations or the police
about the illegal video for-profit scam?
Here are questions
that must be answered by these reports and their employers!
1. For how long
and how intimate have these two reporters known these self-proclaimed dealers
and their sources?
2. Has either
of these two reporters ever smoked crack cocaine?
3. Has either
of these two reporters ever bought crack cocaine or other illegal drugs?
4. Did the Star or these two reporters pay to see the staged video or at any time purchase drugs from their sources?
5. Was either of
these two reporters the anonymous voice on the staged cell phone video asking
the questions?
6. Did either of these two reports participate in any way in the making of this phantom cell phone video?
7. Did any Toronto
Star reporter, journalist or employee participate in any way in the
making of this unverified video or attempt to entrap the Mayor to create
a story for enhancing circulation and sales?
8. Did these two
reporters at any time prior to the release of their story advise the
police about their ongoing contacts with these or other drug dealers in Toronto?
It is apparent to
this individual at least that the Toronto Star has had a
political axe to grind with this Mayor since his election as Mayor.
With this latest
story from the Star about the Mayor it is my opinion that the Toronto Star
media corporation has not ensured that this
video and related unverifiable information from such dubious sources whose
motives are in question have not been grounded in fact and have in no way
been verified independently by the journalist as stated in their own Section 1:
Ethics and Excellence: or Accuracy and
Corrections or Fair Play and Payments to
Sources.
The reality of this
ongoing story rests with the very questionable and dubious sources and motives
for monetary gain at the direct expense of the mayor's public person and his
political reputation.
For the Star’s
editorial to be stating “Time to go, Mr. Mayor “ before their own reporters
have themselves answered some very pointed questions relating to their own
involvement in this unverifiable staged cell phone video does not itself in any
way meet an editorial or journalistic smell test.
With that in mind to
me, it is obvious that once again the Star media corporation has backed a
muckraking article and rushed to judgment based on their frenzy mob rule
reporting by pronouncing by reference that the Mayor must be guilty and
sentenced by the media to resign from a political public office before the
Mayor has had the right to a legal trial based on permitted and factual
allowable evidence in our courts of law?
Do editorial ethics
even exist at the Toronto Star or are they just words on paper?
Apparently NOT
according to Rosie DiManno's printed statement," Ethics Shmethics"
that sums up for her and her employer!
Media corporations
and their employees are NOT above the law!
Source
Up Date
Analysis of Clap
Trap you decide @
