From the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic the Democrats have seen their chances of electoral victory come to depend on a prolonged economic shutdown and massive job layoffs, in order to exploit voter discontent and portray Trump as effectively the Herbert Hoover of the 21st century. The national political media have effectively been Trump’s real campaign opponent since the Democratic nominee, Joe Biden, rarely departs his basement.
The media
have carried the ball and have applied their considerable energies to
terrorizing the public about the virus and exaggerating its danger to all
sections of the population (it is highly lethal among the elderly, but less
dangerous to non-seniors).
The teachers’ unions, long joined-at-the-hip allies of the Democratic party, have solemnly announced that they will not return to the classroom until the virus has subsided completely (by which they mean the day after the election if Biden wins).
Since elementary school students are in almost no danger of a fatal affliction, and it is believed that children do not transmit the virus as easily to adults, and the great majority of teachers do not have diminished immune systems and are not above the age of 60, with elemental precautions, there is minimal danger of serious problems.
The president says that those states that do not at least
partially return to in-person schooling will become ineligible for federal
education assistance, which will instead be directed to private, charter or
separate schools, or even neighbourhood home-schooling.
The U.S. Republican party, President Trump himself and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos have all said throughout the last four years that they would make unprecedented efforts to reverse the decline in educational standards in the United States, which they hold to be uncompetitive with other advanced countries.
It is notorious that education standards have declined and
addressing this problem is invariably obstructed by teachers’ unions. Therefore,
schools that are better workplace environments, such as private schools and
even, up to a point, separate schools, have generally better results.
If the Trump administration is re-elected, it is already well-initiated drive to emphasize schools that will produce more internationally competitive graduates will be reinforced and accelerated.
While
teachers’ unions in the U.S. naturally claim that their only interest is the
education and safety of the students, public impatience with their avarice and
widespread incompetence has severely damaged their credibility. In the United
States and other countries, parents are concerned about this trend and
irritated as taxpayers.
Many schools are little better than daycare centres for the slender amount of learning they impart, and apparently, that condition is even worse in many American school districts. To be fair, it is undoubtedly more difficult to educate children who are so thoroughly distracted by modern technological devices that do a great deal of deduction and composition, and almost all physical writing and calculation, for them.
But in the end, there is
no greater contributor to the competitive status of any country and therefore
to its ability to prosper and flourish than the quality of its education.
Leaving out all the many other issues that have arisen during this election in
the United States, this is a policy conflict that could other countries a good
deal of guidance in the practicality and benefit of imposing drastic reforms in
our school systems.
At the same time, the Trump administration has become so exasperated with the cost, slothfulness and often highly anti-American slant of university education, that it is slowly turning the fiscal screws to require post-secondary schools to achieve greater standards of efficiency and higher standards of diversity of intellectual, sociological and political perspectives.
There is no suggestion of dictating curriculum, but there is
clearly a powerful and vocal ambition to require that universities, as was for
centuries their raison d’être, expose students neutrally to a variety of
viewpoints, instead of hatred of every aspect of American life and history:
sausage factories of unpatriotic bigotry and narrow-mindedness.
There is also the issue of huge numbers of ballots
getting into the hands of political organizations that return substantial
numbers of fraudulent ballots in their own interest. In addition to this
mutation of the process, which is called ballot-harvesting, the post office is
in no condition to deal with the requirement to mail out and promptly manage
the return of up to 100 million votes.
Apart from assuring the absence of a monstrous
fraud at the polls, the administration is, in fact, trying to improve the efficiency of the postal service. If it succeeds, that could give other
countries useful information about how to deal with the deterioration of our
own postal services.
Elections, no matter how chaotic, can sometimes be
illuminating.
