In the United
States, hate speech like "Death to America" meets the criteria that
justify limitations on free speech as per the landmark case of Brandenburg v.
Ohio (1969) in my view.
As it is a
direct call to violence against Americans, to nationality, race, religion,
ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, or other protected
characteristics. Thus, it can and must be prosecuted under laws prohibiting
incitement to violence and hate speech.
Individuals
in America who chant this hate slogan must be prosecuted for hate speech
including speech that incites violence or poses a direct threat to public
safety.
Incitement to
Violence: The U.S. Supreme Court has held that speech which directly incites
lawless action or poses a clear and present danger of such action is not
protected by the First Amendment. This principle comes from the landmark case
of Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969). If chanting "Death to America" is
interpreted as a direct call to violence against Americans, it must be
prosecuted under laws prohibiting incitement to violence.
True Threats:
Under U.S. law, "true threats" are not protected speech. A true
threat is a statement that a reasonable person would interpret as a serious
expression of an intent to cause harm or violence. If chanting "Death to
America" is interpreted as a true threat against Americans, it must be
prosecuted under laws prohibiting threats.
Hate Crime
Laws: Hate crimes involving acts calling for violence or threats i.e. death to
America which is motivated by bias or prejudice must be prosecuted under
federal or state hate crime laws. These laws typically enhance penalties for
criminal acts committed because of the victim's race, religion, ethnicity,
nationality, sexual orientation, gender identity, or other protected
characteristics.
State Laws:
Some states have specific laws that criminalize certain types of hate speech or
provide enhanced penalties for hate-motivated crimes. These laws vary by state
and may define hate speech or hate crimes differently. For example, some states
have laws specifically addressing hate speech directed at schools or certain
groups.
Harassment
Laws: Depending on the circumstances, chanting "Death to America"
constitutes targeted harassment or intimidation against individuals or groups
that must be prosecuted under harassment laws.
Facts of the case - Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
Brandenburg, a leader in the Ku Klux Klan, made a speech at a Klan rally and was later convicted under an Ohio criminal syndicalism law. The law made it illegal to advocate "crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform," as well as assembling "with any society, group, or assemblage of persons formed to teach or advocate the doctrines of criminal syndicalism."
Question
Did Ohio's criminal syndicalism law, prohibiting public speech that advocates various illegal activities, violate Brandenburg's right to free speech as protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments?
Conclusion
The Court's Per Curiam opinion held that the Ohio law violated Brandenburg's right to free speech. The Court used a two-pronged test to evaluate speech acts: (1) speech can be prohibited if it is "directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action" and (2) it is "likely to incite or produce such action." The Criminal Syndicalism Act made illegal the advocacy and teaching of doctrines while ignoring whether or not that advocacy and teaching would actually incite imminent lawless action. The failure to make this distinction rendered the law overly broad and in violation of the Constitution.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1968/492
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your thoughts, comments and opinions, will be in touch. Peter Clarke