Careful
consideration and ongoing evaluation will be essential to mitigate potential
drawbacks and ensure positive outcomes for all stakeholders involved.
Proposed
Changes Analysis:
Ontario Land Tribunal
Appeals:
1.
Restricting
third-party appeals may limit community input and transparency in
decision-making processes.
Development
Charges:
2.
Revoking
the phase-in could impact municipal revenue streams needed for infrastructure
development.
Pre-Consultation
Voluntary:
3.
Voluntary
pre-consultation could result in insufficient community engagement and
potentially lead to contentious developments.
Parking
Standards:
4.
Insufficient
parking could lead to congestion and inconvenience for residents and visitors.
Minister’s
Zoning Orders/Community Infrastructure Housing Accelerators:
5.
Overreliance
on MZOs could bypass local planning processes and diminish community
involvement.
“Use it or
Lose it” and Upper Tier Municipalities:
6.
Strict
timelines for development approvals could pressure developers and potentially
result in rushed projects.
Redistribution
of planning responsibilities may strain resources in remaining municipalities.
Public
Notices and Additional Unit Regulations:
7.
Reliance
on digital notices may exclude individuals without internet access or digital
literacy.
Removing
zoning barriers may lead to concerns about neighbourhood character and
infrastructure capacity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your thoughts, comments and opinions, will be in touch. Peter Clarke