European Union Constitution Not Conceived by We the People

The media and other supports of a new world order would have us all believe that the E U’s constitution is a force for democracy, human rights and of course the protection of minorities.

However, the truthful fact is that the constitutional settlement of the EU was adopted in defiance of the will of its citizens within its own boundaries. 

Let's keep in mind that the constitution of the USA commences with We the People, whereas the EU constitution, as amended under the European Treaties, starts with His Majesty the King of the Belgians!

 

From its beginning the EU dismissed the referendum results from the citizens of those countries within its own borders in favor of a constitutional structure that in reality is essentially and without question anti democratic in nature.

A document initiated from the top down by aristocrats, technocrats and lifelong bureaucrats for their desire of a community of people that an overwhelming majority of European citizens did not accept.

The EU, similar to other ultra nationalistic European governments in the past that had no time for a parliamentary democracy, has accepted undemocratic constitutional means in determining a method for a united Europe.

Its formation and constitution achieved relevant majorities in the legislative bodies by not accepting the referendum results or by the ballots of its citizens.    

The EU was a reorganization from the top down of the body politics that throughout the history of Europe by numerous previous leaders spoke for the forced creation of a socialistic community of the people by the government technocrats and bureaucrats but not by the people or for the citizens of any member countries.   

Its constitution, regulations and governing system vested its supreme powers into the hands of an appointed European commission consisting of unelected career technocrats and jobs for life bureaucrats.

Embodied in the regulations and constitution the EU executive through its supreme power has a monopoly on the right to legislation, which in terms of democracy is an outrageous concentration of power to be wielded by unelected life long career officials.

The constitution and regulations were deliberately conceived to ensure that these appointed and unelected officials would be invincible from the ballot boxes of member states.

Thanks to this Europeanization of formerly independent European governments through the formation of the EU one can accurately conclude that this body is nothing more than a fanatical extreme of Supra nationalism at the highest social ethics and morality as envisioned through the eyes of career unelected aristocrats, technocrats and bureaucrats with lifelong jobs at taxpayers expense.

When given the choice between democracy and supreme dictatorial powers the EU shall always side with supra nationalism by means of an autocratic form of government.

As such the European Union is nothing more than an autocratic form of government in keeping the that type's and forms of government's throughout Europe over the centuries that unfortunately still exist today. 

Citizens from all countries should keep in mind that the political class of aristocrats, technocrats and lifelong career bureaucrats represents no one but themselves.

The factual conclusion is that European Union's constitution is based on empowering the government and controlling the citizens
whereas the constitution of the United States of America was based on empowering the people and controlling the government.   

Readings @

http://www.proyectos.cchs.csic.es/euroconstitution/

http://eu.um.dk/en/about-us/representatives/

http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/

http://www.eunow.eu/eublog/?p=4

http://europa.eu/about-eu/institutions-bodies/index_en.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Parliament

http://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/culturaldiplomacynews/participant-papers/eu/Maria-Eremenko-Political-participation-Model-by-Verba-in-the-EU-and-Russia.pdf

 

Clarke, I Believe the Mayors Neighbour, NOT the Star or Dale Daniel!

My conclusion, after reading and viewing both Daniels’s and the Mayor's statements and watching the public interview videos, is that this Star reporter was not being fully honest or transparent with his statement or about his actual activities with his cell phone at dusk lurking around the exterior of the Mayor’s family residence.

The one and only truly independent observer of the events was the Mayors neighbour, not any employees or spokespersons for the Star’s version of events.

This Mayor's neighbour clearly stated that he saw this guy stepping on the cinder blocks end of story!

Besides what kind of gaffe-prone so called award winning journalist from his De facto group of other so called journalists would be out at dusk or night with a cell phone camera attempting to do a story?

More likely he was attempting to continue the ongoing premeditated provocations against Toronto's Mayor for the sake of a story!

Article @

http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1173278--james-i-believe-daniel-dale?bn=1#article

Toronto’s Budgeting and Accounting Systems Unbalanced

Having an Operating Budget Surplus of
$ 292 Million coupled  with a Capital Deficit of $ 2.4 BILLION should demand that immediate changes are legislatively required to reign in Toronto councillors ability to unnecessarily add new taxes on already overburdened property and business taxpayers.  

The reality is that City government and the City of Toronto Act has to be amended in order for this Mayor or any proceeding Mayor to succeed.

Toronto must be direct by the province to ensure that spending for maintaining and protecting the City’s infrastructure and ensuring that services demanded by the citizens of Toronto will be delivered in a sustainable manner.

To do this the province should immediately introduce legislation that legally stipulates and requires that the City of Toronto MUST apply any and all yearly operating surpluses against long term existing debit for capital budgets.

If this had been in place today Toronto would have by now eliminated $1.290 Billion from the current tax payer supported debt of $2.4 Billion dollars.

The future for the City’s budgeting process for all departments, agencies, commissions Boards etc. must be changed to a ZBB from the current outdated historical incremental budgeting system in which the new budget starts with the balance at least equal to the previous year’s total balance or estimate.

The Zero base budgeting (ZBB) process commences with the budget development system in which all departments, services and programs within the budget start with a heading of zero and detects inflated budgets and has a greater political control over executives, managers, services and programs.

It would further assist in channelizing the City’s ample existing tax revenues from low priority to high priority areas.

Councillors’  continued outrageous practice of increasing spending at an average rate of 5.21% annually since 2003 over revenues represents a 1.9% ABOVE INFLATION RATES because of their chronic ingratiating appetite to spend our money.

Each unnecessary 2% increase in tax rates since 2003 has siphoned over $22 MILLION DOLLARS from Toronto Renters, Condo, Single Family Homeowners and Businesses alike.

We must all remember that since amalgamation incumbent councillors have approved spending by 64.23%, introduced unnecessary new taxes when the problem remains one of spending and not revenues at Toronto council.

Up Date http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2013/03/13/how_to_curb_bureaucratic_empirebuilding_goar.html

Articles @

http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1170784--james-rob-ford-did-not-invent-budget-surplus?bn=1

http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1170608--toronto-budget-windfall-surfaces

Primary Goal of All Revolutions or Civil Wars is Power.

How can the media or the world truly and realistically trust unconfirmed one sided biased reports from activist, revolutionary dissidents from either side of this Syrian civil war and revolution?

Who are the Puppet Masters and Wire Pullers attempting to dictate a one sided ceasefire?

Why is it that these biased and unconfirmed propaganda reports, dictated to the world’s media by activists and revolutionaries, relating to any mounting violence are always committed solely be Syrian government forces?

No mention ever of the army deserters and revolutionary attempts of lawless by mob rule, which are also criminal act of aggression and crimes against humanity, too overthrow Syria’s constitutionally and duly elected government?

No blame placed on the revolutionary military bureau, set up by the unelected De facto self anointed revolutionary Syrian National Council members or the revolutionary free Syrian army deserters, to coordinate the revolutionary armed opposition to the legitimate government in power!  

In all probability the world is witnessing desertions from Syria’s armed forces on the basis of clan alignment and radical Islamic religious beliefs! 

When military personnel go AWOL and then put on masks and commence massacring their former comrades in uniform they are committing treason against the people they swore to protect and then proceed to kill fellow citizens that they took an oath to keep them against such lawlessness and anarchy?

For such deception and treasonous acts under the name of an unelected opposition, the exiled revolutionary council and the Syrian free army deserters are all subject to and must be held accountable and punishable by military under international law for any of these traitorous or terrorist actions and killings of civilians!

Anyone who understands history realizes that the primary goal of every revolution or civil war is that of gaining power as power is considered the crucial target of all revolutionary's.

And  the world media can rest assured that these revolutionaries themselves made up of military deserters are NOT going to pledge or recognize any UN backed ceasefire or one offered by the current leaders of power in Damascus.

Thus the possibility exists that Syrian security forces who deserted from the military known as the Free Syrian Army supporting the De facto self anointed revolutionary unelected Syrian National Council members where the ones who actually shot dead four civilians on a bus in the northern province of Idlib on Wednesday and many other such domestic terrorists acts.

Further it has become increasingly clear that two goals of the Arab Muslim spring uprisings, a year ago along with the foreign assisted civil war of Libya and the anarchist’s revolution in Egypt, were  to establish Sharia law through militant secularization revolution by incorporating Islam as the state religion and to achieve financial control of the country’s oil resources.

The ancient Arabic translation of Sharia law relates to a path to the water hole and considering today’s position could cause the route to the oil holes? 

Syria’s oil and gas reserves opposed to those of Egypt and Libya remains a top secret of its duly elected government and Islam is not currently the state religion.

Now Syria currently produces some 401,000 barrels of oil per day compared to the 662,600 (bbl/day) produced by Egypt and the 1.789 million (bbl/day) of oil produced by Libya. 

The UN and peoples acceptance by condoning the treasonous acts of deserters, from the Syrian government’s armed force, based on their claim that the elected Syrian government has “lost their legitimacy” and that “the free Syrian army to work hand in hand with the people to bring the regime down, protect the revolution and the country’s resources” sure sounds like a declaration of war, by Syrian army deserters, against the duly elected and recognized leaders by the Syrian people.

Please keep in mind the very important and practical detail about these De facto self anointed groups of unelected individuals that it is Libya and Egypt, two countries in turmoil because of outside interference, are the only nations to recognize this De facto revolutionary group besides France.

One would think that after what happened in Egypt and especially after the Libya fiasco the time and now with these self anointed and unelected opposition groups formed by De facto entities the UN and most legitimate government representative at the United Nations would now abide by the founding charter of the UN?

The United Nations charter states that nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter.

The civil war in Syria is definitely under the domestic jurisdiction of the state of Syria.

2nd Up Dates

Geneva 2: Not Much Hope for Peace in Syria Author / Source / Date: 

Prabir Purkayastha, June 1, 2013

 

http://newsclick.in/international/geneva-2-not-much-hope-peace-syria

Islamists auction off cars to buy Syrian rebels heat-seeking missiles-Toronto Star

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/06/28/islamists_auction_off_cars_to_buy_syrian_rebels_heatseeking_missiles.html

1st Up Date 2013 @ http://www.thestar.com/news/2013/02/15/the_star_in_syria_factions_emerge_among_rebel_fighters.html

UPDATE @

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/21/world/middleeast/cia-said-to-aid-in-steering-arms-to-syrian-rebels.html?_r=1&hp

 

Articles @

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/syria-peace-plan-seriously-compromised-france-154918941.html

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/un-report-says-unexploded-cluster-munitions-found-sri-085703777.html

Prime Example of Inept Budgeting for the Sole Purpose of Retaining Political Power.

This provincial government of McGuinty propped up by the NDP is showing taxpayers that it is oblivious to proven economic reality that higher or wealth taxes have a negative impact on the economy 99 out of 100 times and a 1 chance out of 100 that taxes have no economic impact.

Ontario did not need a tax increase on anyone but rather a tax decrease and a limit on government spending of no greater increase of that of the country's annual inflation rate.

Let me predict that this tax on the so called rich will only modestly increase revenues but shall have not effect whatsoever on reducing the provincial debt or increasing employment within the province.

Ontarians only have to look south of the boarder to California to see what happened to that state with their progressive income tax on its so called wealthy or high income residents.

By cuddling up to the NDP with its union activist supporters and those from the environmental and poverty lobbyists McGuinty and the NDP with this budget agreement have torpedoed Ontario's small and retail service businesses and are treating so called rich residents as if they were all TD Canada Trust green  dispensing machines with endless cash.

Article @

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1166296--ontario-budget-mcguinty-and-horwath-in-last-ditch-talks-to-prevent-election?bn=1

Higher Taxes and a Deal with the NDP Not the Answer.

The NDP has always been a political party that helps themselves to the property of others and which they shall never stop.

Have we all forgotten the NDP Rae government?

The best way to grow the economy and reduce government debt is by reducing NOT increasing the taxes on income by an by an across the board reduction in personal and corporate income tax cuts as recommended by the late John F. Kennedy.

Class warfare through higher income distribution by those who already pay the highest taxes is NOT the answer.

Time that the 34% of Ontarians who pay NO federal or provincial income tax to pay a minimum tax of $1,000 per year and eliminate some of the tax loopholes that exist for corporations.

The NDP seems to believe that union jobs are a luxury to be paid for by others.

Let us not forget that the US A's economy is very similar to ours and they tried a 10% tax surcharge or luxury tax on the so called rich and discovered that higher taxes rates generated less revenues for government than anticipated.   

Article @

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1165884--ontario-budget-2012-mcguinty-should-meet-horwath-half-way-or-we-ll-all-pay-cohn?bn=1

Every One has Individual Rights Including Toronto’s Mayor Rob Ford.

No Mayor has a Duty to Represent any Special Interest Group and Especially Not One that Continually has Mocked his Individual Rights and Beliefs.

Mayors do not have to attend any parade be it St. Patrick’s Day, Easter, Khalsa Day, Caribana or the Santa Clause parade.

Mayor Ford unlike his political predecessors has shown that he cannot be molded like play dough by the left leaning ideologies of special interest groups supported by muckraking journalists and self serving politicians.

When forced to choose between his personal moral rights or giving in to threats and intimidation Mayor Ford once again has shown voters that as Mayor he shall not turn his back on his personal family principles for the sake of political expediency in support of deconstructionists or special interest groups and has again stood his ground as an individual.

PS. Why the constant yearly push by the media to force the Mayor and other non gay and lesbian Toronto residents to conform to a lifestyle and believe that they do not share?  

If we are a truly free and democratic country, citizens must have the basic individual right to decide for themselves or has it become the goal of the main stream gays, lesbians and bisexuals to force its ideals onto Torontonians and others in their attempt reduce individual rights to create a  society that must conform to only one viewpoint?

And when one does not conform you are instantly labeled a homophobic!      

Do not get me wrong as I am not suggesting that lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals not be allowed to hold and have their personal beliefs and ideals.

I have the strong position that individual’s within our Canadian society must be allowed to decide for themselves what is best for them as an individual and not be chastised by the media or special interest groups for holding an opposite viewpoint from those of  bisexuals, gays and lesbians.   

Article @

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/article/1164749--mayor-rob-ford-won-t-attend-pride-he-s-out-of-touch-with-toronto

http://www.thestar.com/news/cityhallpolitics/article/1163028--mayor-rob-ford-refuses-to-say-if-he-will-attend-pride?bn=1